A Bibliography
of Teacher Evaluation Articles, Books, & Documents

Updated 2012

Teacher Evaluation:
New Directions & Practices 

 

Home
New Practices
Forms
New Procedures
Reference Book

Principles
Improved Principal Roles

District Support

Questions, Networks & Links
Essay

References
Acheson, K. & Gall, M. (1980). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers. New York: Longman.
Aleamoni, L.M. (1981). Student ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Aleamoni, L.M. (1987). Student rating myths versus research facts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 111-119.
Alfonso, R.J. (1977). Will peer supervision work? Educational Leadership, 34, 594-601.
Allen, D. & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Amatora, M. (1954). Teacher rating by younger pupils. Journal of Teacher Education, 5 (2), 149-152.
American Educational Research Association (1953). Second Report of the Committee on the Criteria of Teacher Effectiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 46, 641-658.
American Federation of Teachers (1996). Making standards work. Washington, D.C.: author.
Anderson, H.M. (1954). A study of certain criteria of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Education, 23, 41-71.
Annunziata, J. (1998). Understanding and ensuring due process. CREATE Newsletter, 1 (1), 3.
Annunziata, J. (1999). Richard Fossey: If a practitioner cleans the windows, will you look in? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 83-92.
Anthony, B.M. (1968). A new approach to merit rating of teachers. Administrator's Notebook, 17 (1), 1-4.
Applebome, P. (1995). Have schools failed? New York Times. December 13, B16.

Barnes, F., & Miller, M. (2001). Data analysis by walking around. The School Administrator. Retrieved from http://www.aasa.org/publications/sa/2001_4/barnes_april2001.htm
Barr, A.S. & Burton, W.H. (1926). The supervision of instruction. New York: D. Appleton.
Batista, E. (1976). The place of colleague evaluation in the appraisal of college teaching. Research in Higher Education, 4, 257-271.
Bergman, J. (1980). Peer evaluation of university faculty. College Student Journal, 14 (3), Part 2, 1-21.
Bernstein, E. (2004). What teacher evaluation should know and be able to do. NASSP Bulletin, 88 (639), 80-88.
Berk, R.A. (1988). Fifty reasons why student gain does not mean teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1 (4), 345-363.
Berliner, D.C., & Biddle, B.J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America's schools. NY: Addison-Wesley.
Berman, P. & McLaughlin, M.W. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, vol. viii: Implementing and sustaining innovations (R-1589/8-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Bingham, R.D., Heywood, J.S., & White, S.B. (1991). Evaluating schools and teachers based on student performance. Evaluation Review, 15, 191-218.
Bird, T. (1990). The schoolteacher's portfolio: An essay on possibilities. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary teachers (pp. 241-256). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Black, J.A., & English, F.W. (1986). What they don't tell you in schools of education about school administration. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Publishing Company.
Blair, J. (2004). Building bridges with the press: A guide for educators. Bethesda, MD: Education Week Press.
Blackburn, R. & Clark, M. (1975). An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrators, colleagues, students and self ratings. Sociology of Education, 48, 242-256.
Blasé, J., & Blasé, &. (2000). Empowering teachers (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bloom, B.S., (Ed.), Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W. & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: McKay.
Blumberg, A., & Greenfield, W. (1980). The effective principal: Perspectives on school leadership. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Bodine, R. (1973). Teachers' self-assessment. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 169-173). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Borich, G.D. & Madden, S.K. (1977). Evaluating classroom instruction: A sourcebook of instruments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Borich, G.D. (1990). Observation skills for effective teaching. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Boyce, A.C. (1915). Methods of measuring teachers' efficiency. Fourteenth yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part II. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Co.
Brandt, R. (1993). On outcome-based education: A conversation with Bill Spady. Educational Leadership, 50 (4) 66-70.
Braskamp, L.A. (1980). What research says about the components of teaching. In W.R. Duckett (Ed.), Observation and the evaluation of teaching (pp. 62-86). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
Brauchle, P., Mclarty, J. & Parker, J. (1989). A portfolio approach to using student performance data to measure teacher effectiveness. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 17-30.
Braunstein, D., Klein, B. & Pachio, M. (1973). Feedback expectancy and shifts in student rating: Reliability, validity and usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 254-258.
Bridges, E.M. (1992). The incompetent teacher (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
Bridges, E.M., & Groves, B.R. (1999). The macro- and micro politics of personnel evaluation: A framework. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13 (4), 321-338.
Brookover, W. (1940). Person-person interaction between teachers and pupils and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 272-287.
Bryant, M.T. (1990). A study of administrative expertise in participant performance on the NASSP Assessment Center. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 353-364.

California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (1997). California standards for the teaching profession. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: author.
Carroll, J. (1981). Faculty self evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 180-200). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Carson, C.C., Huelskamp, R.M., & Woodall, T.D. (1993). Perspectives on education in America. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 259- 311.
Castaneda, A., & Gray, T. (1974). Bicognitive processes in multicultural education. Educational Leadership, 32 (2), 203-207.
Cazden, C.B., & Leggett, E.L. (1981). Culturally responsive education: Recommendations for achieving Lau remedies II. In H.T. Trueba, et al. (Eds.) Culture and the bilingual classroom. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Cederblom, D. & Lounsbury, J. (1980). An investigation of user-acceptance of peer evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 33, 567.
Centra, J.A. (1972). Strategies for improving college teaching. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Centra, J.A. (1973) Self-ratings of college teachers: A comparison with student ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10, 287-295.
Centra, J.A. (1975). Colleagues as raters of classroom instruction. Journal of Higher Education, 46, 327-337.
Centra, J.A. (1977). The how and why of evaluating teaching. New Directions for Higher Education, 17, 93-106.
Centra, J.A. (1980). Determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Christensen, C. (1960). Relationships between pupil achievement, pupil affect need, teacher warmth and teacher permissiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 169-173.
Cizek, G.J. (1993). Rethinking psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 22 (4), 4-9.
Clark. L. (2004). Computerized adaptive testing: Effective measurement for all students. Technological Horizons in Education Journal, 31 (10), 14, 18, 20.
Cohen, D.K. (1973). Politics and research. Review of Educational Research, 40, 213-238.
Cohen, P.A. & McKeachie, W.J. (1980). The role of colleagues in the evaluation of college teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 28, 147-154.
Cohen, P.A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-310.
Coker, H., Medley, D.M. & Soar, R.S. (1980). How valid are expert opinions about effective teaching? Phi Delta Kappan, 62 (2), 131-134, 149.
Colby, S.A., Bradshaw, L.K., & Joyner, R.L. (2002). Teacher evaluation: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April.
Combs, A.W. (1965). The professional education of teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cook, M.A. & Richards, H.C. (1972). Dimensions of principal and supervisor ratings of teacher behavior. Journal of Experimental Education, 41 (2), 11-14.
Corwin, R.G. & Edelfelt, R.A. (1976). Perspectives on organizations: Viewpoints for teachers. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Crow, N. & Peterson, K. (1983). The common sociology between teacher evaluation and teacher development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 244 960. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56 (1), 18-36.
Cusick, P.A. (1973). Inside high school: The student's world. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wise, A.E., & Pease, S.R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 53, 285-328.
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. NY: Academic Press.
Delandshere, G. & Petrosky, A.R. (1994). Capturing teachers' knowledge: Performance assessment. Educational Researcher, 23 (5), 11-18.
DeSander, M.K. (2000). Teacher evaluation and merit pay: Legal considerations, practical concerns. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14 (4), 307-317.
Downey, C.J., Steffy, B.E., English, F.W., Frase, L.E., & Poston, W.K. (2004). The three-minute classroom walk-through. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Drake, T.L., & Roe, W.H. (1986). The principalship. NY: Macmillan.
Driscoll, A., Peterson, K., Crow, N. & Larson, B. (1985). Student reports for primary teacher evaluation. Educational Research Quarterly, 9 (3), 43-50.
Driscoll, A., Stevens, D. & Peterson, K. (1990). Teacher evaluation in early childhood education: What information can young children provide? Child Study Journal, 20, 67-79.
Dunklee, D.R., & Shoop, R.J. (2002). The principal's quick-reference guide to school law. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Elbow, P. (1986). Embracing contraries: Explorations in learning and teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellett, C.D. (1997). Classroom-based assessments of teaching and learning. In J.H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 107-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Ellison, R.L., Fox, D.G., & Orme, D. (1996). The norming study: Further refinement and the establishment of standards for The Jordan Performance Appraisal System. Sandy, UT: Jordan School District.
Epstein, J.L. (1985). A question of merit: Principals' and parents' evaluations of teachers. Educational Researcher, 14 (7), 3-8.
Erffmeyer, E.S. & Martray, C.R. (1990). A quantified approach to the evaluation of teacher professional growth and development and professional leadership through a goal-setting process. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 275-300.
Erikson, E.H. (1964). A memorandum on identity and Negro youth. Journal of Social Issues, 20 (4), 29-42.
Erlandson, D.A. (1973). Evaluation and an administrator's autonomy. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 20-26). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Etzioni, A. (1969). The semi-professions and their organization. New York: Free Press.
Evertson, C.M. & Burry, J.A. (1989). Capturing classroom context: The observation system as lens for assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 297-320.

Festinger, L.A. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Fischer, L. & Schimmel, D. (1973). The civil rights of teachers. New York: Harper & Row.
Fisher, C. (1978). Teaching behaviors, Academic Learning Time, and student achievement. (Final Report of Phase III-B, Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study). San Francisco, CA: Far West Laboratory.
Flanders, N.A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Fortune, J.C. (1985). Understanding testing in occupational licensing. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Fossey, R. (1998). Legal notes: Secret settlement agreements between school districts and problem employees. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 61-68.
French, R.L. (1984). Dispelling the myths about Tennessee's career ladder program. Educational Leadership, 42 (4), 9-13.
French-Lazovik, G. (1981). Peer review: Documenting evidence in the evaluation of teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 73-89). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Friend, J.H. & Guralnik, D.B. (Eds.) (1960). Webster's new world dictionary. New York: World Publishing Co.

Gallup, G. (1984). The 16th annual Gallup poll of the public's attitude toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 23-28.
Gathercole, C.E. (1968). Assessment in clinical psychology. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
Gestwicki, C. (1987). Home, school, and community relations: A guide to working with parents. Albany, NY: Delmar.
Ginsberg, A., McLaughlin, M., Plisco, V. & Takai, R. (1992). Reinvigorating program evaluation at the U.S. Department of Education. Educational Researcher, 21 (3), 24-27.
Ginsberg, R. & Berry, B. (1990). The folklore of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 205-230.
Glasman, N.S. & Biniaminov, I. (1981). Input-output analysis of schools. Review of Educational Research, 51, 509-539.
Glass, G.V. (1974). A review of three methods of determining teacher effectiveness. In H.J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance (pp. 11-32). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Glass, G.V. (1990). Using student test scores to evaluate teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 229-240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goebel, B.L. & Cashen, V.M. (1979). Age, sex and attractiveness as a factor in student rating of teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 646-653.
Good, T. & Brophy, J. (1980). Educational psychology: A realistic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Good, T.L. & Brophy, J.E. (1987). Looking in classrooms (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Good, T.L. & Mulryan, C. (1990). Teacher ratings: A call for teacher control and self-evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 191-215). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Good, T.L. (1980). Classroom observations: Potential and problems. In W.R. Duckett (Ed.), Observation and the evaluation of teaching (pp. 2-44). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
Good, T.L., Sikes, J.N. & Brophy, J.E. (1973). Effects of teacher sex and student sex on classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 74-87.
Goodlad, J. (1970). Behind the classroom door. Worthington, OH: Jones Publishing.
Goodman, N. (1992). Introduction to sociology. New York: HarperCollins.
Gooler, D.D. (1973). Evaluation and the public. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 306-318). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Grayson, D.A. & Martin, M.D. (1990). GESA: Gender/ethnic expectations and student achievement. Earlham, IA: Gray Mill.
Greenfield, W. (Ed.) (1987). Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues, and controversies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gunne, C. & Peterson, K.D. (1990). Use of an academic aptitude test for teacher preservice admissions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 17 (2), 85-92.
Guskey, T.R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Guthrie, J. (1970). Survey of school effectiveness studies. In A. Mood (Ed.), Do teachers make a difference? (pp. 25-54). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Haak, R.A., Kleiber, D.A. & Peck, R.F. (1972). Student evaluations of teacher instrument II, manual. Austin, TX: R&D Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas.
Haertel, E.H. (1987). Toward a national board of teaching standards: The Stanford Teacher Assessment Project. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 6 (1), 23-24.
Haertel, E.H. (1990). Performance tests, simulations, and other methods. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 278-294). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research 1980-1996. Educational Administration Quarterly. 32 (1), 5-44.
Hallinger, P., & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration: An introduction. Journal of Educational Administration, 34 (5), 4-11.
Harris, B.M. (1986). Developmental teacher evaluation. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Harris, W. (1981). Teacher command of subject matter. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 58-72). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hass, G. (1978). Curriculum planning: A new approach. (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Hastie, R., Penrod, S. & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Heath, R. & Nelson, M. (1974). The research basis for performance-based teacher education. Review of Educational Research, 44, 463-484.
Hebert, E.A. (1992). Portfolios invite reflection--from students and staff. Educational Leadership, 49 (8), 58-61.
Herman, J.L. & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52 (2), 48-55.
Hill, C.W. (1921). The efficiency ratings of teachers. Elementary School Journal, 21, 438-443.
Hoenack, S.A., & Monk, H.H. (1990). Economic aspects of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.). The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 390-402). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Holland, P.A. (2004). Principals as supervisors: A balancing act. NASSP Bulletin, 88 (639), 3-14.
Holly, P., & Southworth, G. (1989). The developing school. NY: Falmer Press.
Homans, G.C. (1950). The human group. NY: Harcourt & Brace.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social behavior: It's elementary forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hoogeveen, K. & Gutkin, T.B. (1986). Collegial ratings among school personnel: An empirical examination of the merit pay concept. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 375-381.
House, E.R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
House, E.R. (Ed.) (1973). School evaluation: The politics and process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Houston, W.R. & Howsam, R.B. (Eds.) (1972). Competency-based teacher education. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Hunt. J.B. (2004). A quid pro quo for teacher quality. Education Week, 23 (40), 52-44.
Hunter, M. (1976). Rx improved instruction. El Segundo, CA: TIP Publications.
Hyman, R.T. (1884). Testing for teacher competence: The logic, the law, and the implications. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 14-18.

Jackson, G. & Cosca, C. (1974). The inequality of educational opportunity in the Southwest: An observational study of ethnically mixed classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 219-229.
Jackson, G., & Cosca, G. (1974). The inequality of educational opportunity in the Southwest: An observational study of ethnically mixed classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 10 (2), 219-229.
Johnson, S. (1984). Teacher unions in the schools. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Johnson, S.M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The personnel evaluation standards. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Jordan School District (1995). Jordan Performance Appraisal System. Sandy, UT: author.

Kagan, S., & M.C. Madsen (1971). Cooperation and competition of Mexican, Mexican-American and Anglo-American children of two ages under four instructional sets. Developmental Psychology, 5, 32-39.
Kalven, H. & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston: Little Brown.
Kauchak, D. & Peterson, K. (1982). Student evaluations: An additional source of information. Colleague, 4 (3), 1-5.
Kauchak, D., Peterson, K. & Driscoll, A. (1985). An interview study of teachers' attitudes toward teacher evaluation practices. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 19 (1), 32-37.
Kearney, C. P. & Huyser, R.J. (1973). The politics of reporting results. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 47-59). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Keller, B. (1998). Principal matters. Education Week, 25-27.
Kerlinger, F. (1971). Student evaluations of university professors. School and Society, 99, 353-356.
Kimbrough, R.B. (1964). Political power and educational decision-making. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Kliebard, H.M. (1993). What is a knowledge base, and who would use it if we had one? Review of Educational Research, 63, 295-303.
Knezevich, S.J. (1977). Designing performance appraisal systems. In G. Borich (Ed.), The appraisal of teaching: Concepts and process (pp. 206-215). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Krajewski, R.J. (1987). Secondary principals want to be instructional leaders. Phi Delta Kappa (Sept.), 60, 65-69.
Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S. & Masia, B.B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Landis, L.M. & Pirro, E.B. (1977). Required, elective student differences in course evaluations. Teaching Political Science, 4, 405-422.
Larsen, O.N. & Catton, W.R. (1962). Conceptual sociology. New York: Harper & Row.
Lawrence, C.E., Vachon, M.K., Leake, D.O. & Leake, B.H. (2001). The marginal teacher: A step by step guide to fair procedures for identification and dismissal. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
Levin, H.M., Glass, G.V. & Meister, G.R. (1987). Cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction. Evaluation Review, 6 (1), 50-72.
Levitan, S.A. (1992). Evaluation of federal social programs: An uncertain impact. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Center for Social Policy Studies.
Lewis, A.C. (1982). Evaluating educational personnel. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Lewis, L.S. (1975). Scaling the ivory tower: Merit and its limits in academic careers. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lieberman, M. (1972). Should teachers evaluate other teachers? School Management, 16 (6), 4.
Lightfoot, S.L. (1983). The good high school. New York: Basic Books.
Lind, M. (1997). Up from conservatism. NY: Free Press Paperbacks.
Linn, R.L., & Herman, J.L. (1997). A policymaker's guide to standards-led assessment. (ERIC Document ED 408 680). Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
Lloyd-Bostock, S. (1989). Law in practice: Applications of psychology to legal decision making and legal skills. Chicago, IL: Lyceum.
Lober, I.M. (1993). Promoting your school: A public relations handbook. Lancaster, PA: Technomic Press.
Lortie, D.C. (1967). Rational decision making: Is it possible today? EPIE Forum, 1 (3), 6-9.
Lortie, D.C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Loup, K., Garland, J., Ellett, C., & Rugutt, J. (1996). Ten years later: Findings from a replication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10 (3), 203-226.
Lyons, G. (1979). Why teachers can't teach. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 108-112.

MacDonald, B. (1973). Briefing decision makers. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 174-188). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Madaus, G. & Mehrens, W.A. (1990). Conventional tests for licensure. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 257-277). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Madaus, G.F. (1988). The influence of testing on the curriculum. In L.N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum: Eighty-seventh yearbook of the national Society for the Study of Education (pp. 83-121). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Manatt, R. P. & Daniels, B. (1990). Relationships between principals' ratings of teacher performance and student achievement. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 189-202.
Manatt, R. P. & Manatt, S.B. (1984). Clinical manual for teacher performance evaluation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Research Foundation.
Mark, M.M. & Shotland, R.L. (1985). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments. Evaluation Review, 9, 605-626.
Marsh, H.W. (1980). Research on students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A reply to Vecchio. Instructional Evaluation, 4 (2), 5-12.
McCall, W. & Krause, G., (1959). Measurement of teacher merit for salary purposes. Journal of Educational Research, 53, 73-75.
McCarthey, S.J. & Peterson, K.D. (1987). Peer review of materials in public school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1 (3), 285-293.
McFaul, S.A. & Cooper, J.M. (1984). Peer clinical supervision: Theory vs. reality. Educational Leadership, 41 (7), 4-9.
McGreal, T.L. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
McKeachie, W. (1979). Student ratings of faculty. Academe, 65, 384-397.
McLaughlin, M.W. (1990). Embracing contraries: Implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 403-415). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
McNeil, J. & Popham, W. (1973). The assessment of teacher competence. In R.M. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 131-147). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Medley, D.M. & Coker, H. (1987). The accuracy of principals' judgments of teacher performance. Journal of Educational Research, 80 (4), 242-247.
Medley, D.M., Coker, H. & Soar, R.S. (1984). Measurement-based evaluation of teacher performance: An empirical approach. New York: Longman.
Meehl, P.E. & Dahlstrom, W.G. (1960). Objective configural rules for discriminating psychotic from neurotic M.M.P.I. profiles. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 375-387.
Meehl, P.E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Mehrens, W.A. (1990). Combining evaluation data from several sources. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessment of elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 322-336). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mendro, R.L. (1998). Student achievement and school and teacher accountability. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12 (3), 257-268.
Millman, J. (1981). Student achievement as a measure of teacher competence. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 146-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Millman, J. (Ed.) (1997). Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mills, G.E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill.
Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1976). Teacher judgments and pupil observations: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, San Francisco.
Murphy, J. (1987). Teacher evaluation: A comprehensive framework for supervisors. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 157-180.
Murphy, M., Peterson, K. & Kauchak, D. (1985). Analysis of Utah career ladder plans. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 256 031. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Murray, S.L. (1986). Considering policy options for testing teachers. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

Nagel, N. (1995). Real world problem solving. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Narode, R., Rennie-Hill, L. & Peterson, K.D. (1994). Urban community study by preservice teachers. Urban Education, 29 (1), 5-21.
National Association of State Boards of Education (1984). A policymakers guide to improving conditions for principals' effectiveness. Alexandria, VA: Author.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (1996). What teachers should know and be able to do. Detroit, MI: author.
National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). A nation at risk: The imperatives for educational reform. Washington, DC: Department of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: author.
Natriello, G., Deal, T., Dornbusch, S. & Honig, M. (1977). A summary of the recent literature on the evaluation of principals, teachers and students. Stanford Center for Research and Development in teaching (Occasional Paper No. 18). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
Neill, S.B. & Custis, J. (1978). Staff dismissal: Problems and solutions. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Nisbett, R.E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

O'Barr, W.M. (1982). Linguistic evidence: Language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
Ober, R.L., Bentley, E.L. & Miller, E. (1971). Systematic observation of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Osmond, P. (1978). Teacher assessment of supervisory evaluations. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 200 514. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University.
Ostrander, L.P. (1995). Multiple judges of teacher effectiveness: Comparing teacher self-assessments with the perceptions of principals, students, and parents. Doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia.
Ovando, M.N. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15 (3), 213-232.
Owens, R.G. (1991). Organizational behavior in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Parsons, T. (1964). Levels of organization and the mediation of social interaction. Sociological Inquiry, 34, 207-220.
Paulson, F., Paulson, P. & Meyer, C. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48 (5), 60-63.
Perrone, V. (Ed.) (1991). Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Perry, R., Abrami, P. & Leventhal, L. (1979). Educational seduction: The effect of instructor expressiveness and lecture content on student ratings and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 107-116.
Perry-Sheldon, B., & Allain, V.A. (1987). Using educational research in the classroom. Fastback #260. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

Peterson, K. & Kauchak, D. (1982). Teacher evaluation: Perspectives, practices and promises. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 233 996. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Peterson, K. & Kauchak, D. (1983). Progress in development of lines of evidence for teacher evaluation. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 228 228. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Peterson, K. & Mitchell, A. (1985). Teacher controlled evaluation in a career ladder program. Educational Leadership, 43 (3), 44-49.
Peterson, K. & Yaakobi, D. (1980). Israeli science student and teacher perceptions of classroom role performance: Concepts, reports, and adequacy. Science Education, 64, 661-669.
Peterson, K. (1979). Teacher performance and development: A structural model. The Teacher Educator, 15, 22-30.
Peterson, K. (1984). Methodological problems in teacher evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17 (4), 62-70.
Peterson, K. (1985). Politics of the use of teacher academic tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Las Vegas, February.
Peterson, K., Gunne, M., Miller, P. & Rivera, O. (1984). Multiple audience rating form strategies for student evaluation of college teaching. Research in Higher Education, 20, 309-321.
Peterson, K., Kauchak, D. Mitchell, A. McCarthey, S. & Stevens, D. (1986). Utah Teacher Evaluation Project: The Park City career ladder design. ED 265 143. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Peterson, K., Wilson, J., Ulmer, D., Franklin, N., Mitchell, T. & Winget, L. (1984). Teacher career ladders in Utah: Perspectives on early development. ED 246 051. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.
Peterson, K., Yaakobi, D. & Hines, S. (1981). Self-concept and behavior perception changes of student teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 5 (4), 41-50.
Peterson, K. (2004). Research on school teacher evaluation. NASSP Bulletin, 88 (639), 60-79.
Peterson, K.D. (1987a). Teacher evaluation with multiple and variable lines of evidence. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 311-317.
Peterson, K.D. (1987b). Use of standardized tests in teacher evaluation for career ladder systems. Educational Measurement, 6 (1), 19-22.
Peterson, K.D. (1987c). Expert system knowledge base for a computer simulation of judgments on dossiers of school teacher performance. ERIC Document Reproduction System ED 291 339. Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Peterson, K.D. (1988). Reliability of panel judgments for promotion in a school teacher career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21 (4), 95-99.
Peterson, K.D. (1989a). Teacher education program evaluation through an institutional board review of graduates. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22 (4), 14-20.
Peterson, K.D. (1989b). Parent surveys for school teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 309-319.
Peterson, K.D. (1989c). Costs of school teacher evaluation in a career ladder system. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22 (2), 30-36.
Peterson, K.D. (1990a). Assistance and assessment for beginning teachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 104-115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Peterson, K.D. (1990b). DOSSIER: A computer expert system simulation of professional judgments on schoolteacher promotion. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 134-139.
Peterson, K.D. (2000). Teacher evaluation. A comprehensive guide to new directions and practices (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Peterson, K.D. (2002). Effective teacher hiring: A guide to getting the best. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Peterson, K.D. (2006). Using multiple data sources in teacher evaluation systems. In J. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 212-232). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Peterson, K.D., Bennet, B. & Sherman, D.F. (1991). Themes of uncommonly successful teachers of at-risk students. Urban Education, 26, 176-194.
Peterson, K.D. & Chenoweth, T. (1992). School teachers' control and involvement in their own evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 6, 177-189.
Peterson, K.D., Deyhle, D. & Watkins, W. (1988). Evaluation that accommodates minority teacher contributions. Urban Education, 23 (2), 133-149.
Peterson, K.D. & Edwards-Allen, J. (1992). Uses of microcomputers in school teacher evaluation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 392-398.
Peterson, K.D., Kelly, P.P., & Caskey, M.M. (2002). Ethical considerations for teachers in the evaluation of other teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16 (4), 317-324.
Peterson, K.D. & Stevens, D. (1988). Student reports for schoolteacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 259-267.
Peterson, K.D., Stevens, D. & Driscoll, A. (1990). Primary grade student reports for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 165-173.
Peterson, K.D., Stevens, D., & Mack, C. (2001). Presenting complex teacher evaluation data: Advantages of dossier organization techniques over portfolios. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15 (2), 121-134.
Peterson, K.D., Stevens, D., & Ponzio, R.C. (1998). Variable data sources in teacher evaluation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31 (3), 123-132.
Peterson, K.D., Wahlquist, C., Esparza-Brown, J., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2003). Parent surveys for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17, 337-351.

Ponzio, R.C., Peterson, K.D., Miller, J.P. & Kinney, M.B. (1994). A program portfolio/panel review evaluation of 4-H sponsored community-based, social action projects for at-risk youth. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28 (1), 55-65.
Pool, J.E., Ellett, C.D., Schiavone, S., & Carey-Lewis, C. (2001). How valid are the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards assessments for predicting the quality of actual classroom teaching and learning? Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15 (1), 31-48.
Popham, W. (1971). Performance tests of teaching proficiency: Rationale, development, and validation. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 105-117.
Popham, W.J. (1984). Teacher competency testing: The Devil's dilemma. Teacher Education and Practice, 1, 5-9.
Popham, W.J. (1985). The evaluation of teachers: A mission ahead of its measures. Invited address at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Popham, W.J. (1987). The shortcomings of champagne teacher evaluations. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 25-28.
Popham, W.J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1 (3), 269-273.
Popham, W.J., Cruse, K.L., Rankin, S.C., Sandifer, P.D. & Williams, P.L. (1985). Measurement-driven instruction: It's on the road. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 628-634.
Provus, M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Rakow, E.A. & McLarty, J.R. (1990). Equating a multiple-data-source evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3, 261-274.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Read, L.F. (1973). An assessment of the Michigan assessment. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation; The politics and process. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
Rebell, M. (1988). Legal issues concerning bias in testing. In Allan, R., Nassif, P. & Elliot, M. (Eds.), Bias issues in teacher certification issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rebell, M.A. (1990). Legal issues concerning teacher evaluation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 337-355). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Remer, R., & de Mesquita, P.J. (1990). Teaching and learning the skills of interpersonal confrontation. In D.D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict (pp. 225-252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rodger, T.F. & Mowbray, R.M. (1961). Clinical method in psychological medicine. Journal of Medical Education, 36, 167-172.
Rodosky, R. (2002). Comparison of two methods of student gain data analysis. Paper presented at the National Evaluation Institute of the Consortium for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (CREATE). Boise, ID, July.
Rosenbloom, P. (1966). Characteristics of mathematics teachers that affect students' learning. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 021 707. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
Rosenshine, B. & McGaw, B. (1972). Assessing teachers in public education. Phi Delta Kappan, 44 (10), 640-643.
Rosenshine, B. (1970). The stability of teacher effects upon student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 40, 647-662.
Rosenshine, B. (1980). How time is spent in elementary classrooms. In C. Denham and A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to learn. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Rossow, L.F. & Parkinson, J. (1992). The law of teacher evaluation. Topeka, KS: National Organization on Legal Problems of Education.
Rothberg, R. & Buchanan, L. (1981). Teacher perceptions of teacher assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 62, 527.

Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Salt Lake Tribune (1986). 297 Utah teachers strut their stuff, score in top 16% on national test, April 13 (p. B3). Salt Lake City, UT: Salt Lake Tribune.
Sanders, W.L. & Horn, S.P. (1995b). The Tennessee Value Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed model methodology in educational assessment. In A.J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam (Eds), Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice (pp. 337-350). Boston: Kluwer.
Sanders, W.L., & Horn, S. P. (1995a). Educational assessment reassessed: The usefulness of standardized and alternative measures of student achievement as indicators for the assessment of educational outcomes. Educational Policy analysis Archives, 3 (6).
Sanders, W.L., & Horn, S.P. (1998). Research findings from the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) database: Implications for educational evaluation and research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12 (3), 247-256.
Sanders, W.L., Saxton, A.M., & Horn, S.P. (1997). The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System: A quantitative, outcomes-based approach to educational assessment. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 137-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Schalock, H.D., Schalock, M.D., Cowart, B. & Myton, D. (1993). Extending teacher assessment beyond knowledge and skills: An emerging focus on teacher accomplishments. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7, 105-133.
Schalock, M.D. (1998). Accountability, student learning, and the preparation and licensure of teachers: Oregon's teacher work sample methodology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 269-285.
Schlechty, P.C. & Vance, V.S. (1981). Do academically able teachers leave education? The North Carolina case. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, 106-112.
Schmitt, N. & Cohen, S.A. (1990). Criterion-related validity of the assessment center for selection of school administrators. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 4, 203-212.
Schrag, P. (1997). The near-myth of our failing schools. The Atlantic Monthly, October, 72-80.
Schubert, W.H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. NY: Macmillan.
Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagne & M. Scriven (Eds.), AERA monograph review on curriculum evaluation: No. 1 (pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1972). Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 3 (4), 1-4.
Scriven, M. (1973a). Handbook for Model Training Program in qualitative educational evaluation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Scriven, M. (1973b). Goal free evaluation. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 319-328). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Scriven, M. (1973c). The evaluation of educational goals, instructional procedures and outcomes. ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 079 394. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Scriven, M. (1976). Evaluation in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 13, 363-368.
Scriven, M. (1977). The evaluation of teachers and teaching. In G. Borich (Ed.), The appraisal of teaching: Concepts and process (pp. 186-193). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 244-271). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Scriven, M. (1987). Validity in personnel evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 9-24.
Scriven, M. (1988). Duty-based teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 319-334.
Scriven, M. (1994). Using student ratings in teacher evaluation. Evaluation Perspectives, 4 (1), 1-2, 4-6.
Scriven, M. (1997). Due process in adverse personnel action. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 127-137.
Sergiovanni, T. (1977). Reforming teacher evaluation: Naturalistic alternatives. Educational Leadership, 34, 602-607.
Shimberg, B. (1985). Overview of professional and occupational licensing. In J.C. Fortune (Ed.), Understanding testing in occupational licensing (pp. 1-14). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shinkfield, A.J. & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shinkfield, A.J., & Stufflebeam, D. (1995). The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: Assessing Accomplished Teaching. In A.J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam, Teacher evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice (pp. 319-336). Boston: Kluwer.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-22.
Sizemore, B.A. (1985). Pitfalls and promises of effective schools research. Journal of Negro Education, 54 (3), 269-288.
Smith, G.P. (1984). The critical issue of excellence and equity in competency testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 6-9.
Soar, R.S. (1973). Teacher assessment problems and possibilities. Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 205-212.
Soar, R.S., Medley, D.M. & Coker, H. (1983). Teacher evaluation: A critique of currently used methods. Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 239-246.
Spring, J. (1997). Political agendas for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stake, R.E. (1973). Measuring what learners learn. In E. House(Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 193-223). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Stanley, J.C. (1971). Reliability. In R.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Stedman, C.H. (1984). Testing for competency: A Pyrrhic victory? Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (2), 2-5.
Stiggins, R.J. (2004). Student involved assessment for learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stodolsky, S.S. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking. Educational Researcher, 13 (9), 11-18.
Strike, K. & Bull, B. (1981). Fairness and the legal context of teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 301-343). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Strike, K.A. (1990). The ethics of educational evaluation. In J. Millman and L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessing elementary and secondary school teachers (pp. 356-373). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Stronge, J., & Ostrander, L. (1997). Client surveys in teacher evaluation, in J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 129-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Stronge, J.H. & Helm, V. M. (1991). Evaluating professional support personnel in education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Stronge, J.H., & Tucker, P.D. (1999). The politics of teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13 (4), 339-360.
Stronge, J.H., & Tucker, P.D. (2000). Teacher evaluation and student achievement. Annapolis Junction, MD: National Education Association.
Sykes, G. (1997). On trial: The Dallas value-added accountability system. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 110-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Tama, C. & Peterson, K.D. (1991). Teacher reflection through literature. Educational Leadership, 48 (6), 22-24.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L.N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. NY: Macmillan.
Thompson, M.S. (1980). Benefit-cost analysis for program evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Thum, Y.M., & Bryk, A.S. (1997). Value-added productivity indicators: The Dallas system. In J. Millman (Ed.), Grading teachers, grading schools: Is student achievement a valid evaluation measure? (pp. 100-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Time magazine (1980, June 16). Help! Teacher can't teach!, pp. 54-63.
Trask, A. (1964). Principals, teachers and supervision: Dilemmas and solutions. Administrators Notebook, 13 (4), 1-4.
Travers, R.M.W. (1981). Criteria of good teaching. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 14-22). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Tucker, P.D. (1997). Lake Wobegon: Where all teachers are competent (Or, have we come to terms with the problem of incompetent teachers?). Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11 (2), 103-126.
Tuckman, B.W. & Oliver, W.F. (1968). Effectiveness of feedback to teachers as a function of source. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 297-301.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Office of Workforce Relations (1998). Addressing and resolving poor performance: A guide for supervisors. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.opm.gov/perform/poor/frames_dl.html

Valente, W. (1987). Law in the schools (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Co.

Waller, W. (1962, 1932). The sociology of teaching. NY: Russell & Russell.
Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D. & Walberg, H.J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294.
Warner, C. (2000). Promoting your school: Going beyond PR (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Warner, C., & Curry, M. (1997). Everybody's house--the schoolhouse: Best techniques for connecting home, school, and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Watts, D. (1985). Teacher competency testing: Causes and consequences. The Teacher Educator, 20, 15-21.
Webster, W., & Mendro, R. (1995). An accountability system featuring both "value-added" and product measures of schooling. In A.J. Shinkfield & D. Stufflebeam, Teacher evaluation: Guide to Effective Practice (pp. 350-376). Boston: Kluwer.
Weiner, B. & Kukla, A. (1970). An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 1-20.
Weller, L.D., Buttery, T.J. & Bland, R.W. (1994). Teacher evaluation of principals: As viewed by teachers, principals, and superintendents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27 (2), 112-117.
West, P.T. (1985). Educational public relations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (2000). Supervision: A guide to practice (5th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Merrill.
Wilson, B.L. (1991). Influence in schools and the factors that affect it. In S.C. Conley & B.S. Cooper (Eds.) The school as a work environment (pp. 92-106). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wise, A.E. & Gendler, T. (1990). Governance issues in the evaluation of elementary and secondary schoolteachers. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The new handbook of teacher evaluation: Assessment of elementary and secondary teachers (pp. 374-389). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W. & Bernstein, H.T. (1984). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Wolf, K. (1991). The schoolteacher's portfolio: Issues in design, implementation, and evaluation. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 129-136.
Wolf, K., & Dietz, M. (1998). Teaching portfolios: Purposes and possibilities. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25, 9-22.
Wolf, K., Lichtenstein, G. & Stevenson, C. (1997). Portfolios in teacher evaluation, in J. H. Stronge (Ed.), Evaluating teaching: A guide to current thinking and best practice (pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Wolf, K., Lichtenstein, G., Bartlett, E., & Hartman, D. (1996). Teacher portfolios and professional development: The Douglas County Outstanding Teacher program. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 279-286.
Wolf, K., Whinery, B., & Hagerty, P. (1995). Teaching portfolios and portfolio conversations for teacher educators and teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 17, 30-39.
Wolf, R. (1973). How teachers feel toward evaluation. In E. House (Ed.), School evaluation: The politics and process (pp. 156-168). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Wood, C.J. & Pohland, P.A. (1979). Teacher evaluation: The myth and realities. In Duckett, W.R. (Ed.), Planning for the evaluation of teaching (pp. 73-82). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Educational psychology (5th ed.). Needham Hts, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wright, B. & Sherman, B. (1965). Love and mastery in the child's image of the teacher. The School Review, 73 (2), 89-101.
Wright, S.P., Horn, S.P., & Sanders, W.L. (1977). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.
Xu, S., & Sinclair, R.L. (2002). Improving teacher evaluation for increasing student learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. April 2002.

Zirkel, P. (1979). Teacher evaluation: A legal overview. Action in Teacher Education, 2, 17-25.